Martin Schulze wrote:
> > I'm not an expert in such things, but once talked some guys at our
> > university doing such stuff. IIRC you should not let people the
> > possibilitie of a neutral field, to force them to decide between good /
> > bad. Therefore I would recommend to only use four checkboxes by the
> > first questions.
>
> Not sure how useful it is not to be able to rate a talk "ok" in three
> categories, but if it is wished, the list can be reduced to four
> boxes, of course.
I was reminded that 1..5 was 1..4 acceptable and 5 totally off the road.
Alternatively we could use 1..6 so people can rate 3=it's ok and 4=not really
The current form is here: http://people.debian.org/~joey/debian-feedback.ps
Regards,
Joey
-- A mathematician is a machine for converting coffee into theorems. Paul Erdös -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-events-eu-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.orgReceived on Tue May 17 08:27:29 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 17 2005 - 08:27:38 CEST