Alexander Schmehl wrote:
> Thanks for your work!
You're welcome, I appreciate your work as well!
> I'm not an expert in such things, but once talked some guys at our
> university doing such stuff. IIRC you should not let people the
> possibilitie of a neutral field, to force them to decide between good /
> bad. Therefore I would recommend to only use four checkboxes by the
> first questions.
Not sure how useful it is not to be able to rate a talk "ok" in three
categories, but if it is wished, the list can be reduced to four
boxes, of course.
> Furthermore, I would add something like "if dispensible / incompetent /
> bad please give comments why".
I'll add "If you think this particular talk was bad, please give
reason." to the Comments section at the bottom.
> Last not least, we might want to have a german version, too.
Umh... I expect the talks to be held in English, at least about 80%
of them, do you really think we'd need a German form? It's not as if
there was much text on it to grok.
Regards,
Joey
-- A mathematician is a machine for converting coffee into theorems. Paul Erdös -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-events-eu-REQUEST@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.orgReceived on Tue May 17 07:28:05 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 17 2005 - 07:29:42 CEST