On Sun, May 19, 2002 at 08:55:01AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Erik Tews wrote:
> > > > No, this function will not work. For example if a fragment starts at
> > > > 10:00 and ends at 12:00, and you have 2 people assigned to this
> > > > fragment, one from 10:00 to 10:30 and one from 10:30 to 11:00, this code
> > >
> > > This must not happen since it would mean that the person managing a
> > > talk besides the speaker will have to be exchanged *during* the talk.
> > >
> > > A supporter must take the entire shift or none.
> > >
> > > > will think that there are enough people for this fragment. Have a look
> > > > at job-fast.php3 which is able to handle this situation correctly.
> > >
> > > Aha. No such predicate found, but with the above assumption, I
> > > believe the predicate works as expected, no?
> >
> > Yes, so should we remove assignment.starttime and assignment.endtime and
> > add a comment-field? This would make things much more easyer. I first
> > thought that it would be a good idea if it would be possible to exchange
> > a supporter during a talk.
>
> No, please leave it as it is. In case you want to use LTP for CCC and
> you need that, it'll have to be included with a <when> embrace and the
> table fields are required.
I think I don't need that for CCC, so removing this would be a very good
idea which would make finding jobs with a insufficient number of
assigned supporters much more easy.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Sun May 19 2002 - 14:37:27 CEST