Erik Tews wrote:
> > > No, this function will not work. For example if a fragment starts at
> > > 10:00 and ends at 12:00, and you have 2 people assigned to this
> > > fragment, one from 10:00 to 10:30 and one from 10:30 to 11:00, this code
> >
> > This must not happen since it would mean that the person managing a
> > talk besides the speaker will have to be exchanged *during* the talk.
> >
> > A supporter must take the entire shift or none.
> >
> > > will think that there are enough people for this fragment. Have a look
> > > at job-fast.php3 which is able to handle this situation correctly.
> >
> > Aha. No such predicate found, but with the above assumption, I
> > believe the predicate works as expected, no?
>
> Yes, so should we remove assignment.starttime and assignment.endtime and
> add a comment-field? This would make things much more easyer. I first
> thought that it would be a good idea if it would be possible to exchange
> a supporter during a talk.
No, please leave it as it is. In case you want to use LTP for CCC and
you need that, it'll have to be included with a <when> embrace and the
table fields are required.
Regards,
Joey
-- Unix is user friendly ... It's just picky about its friends.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.3 : Sun May 19 2002 - 08:57:16 CEST