From: Bernhard Reiter (bernhard@intevation.de)
Date: Wed Mar 24 2004 - 21:55:47 CET
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 04:34:24PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Bernhard Reiter wrote:
> > Can you make majordomo send our List-Id headers?
> > I would prefer them over X-Mailinglist ones.
>
> Why? In my understanding List-Id lines are as good or bad as
> X-Mailing-List lines. As long as there's a unique identifier in
> the mail header for people to distinguish the list there shouldn't
> be a problem.
Fair enough.
Especially because the List-Id RFC is flawed in my eyes
as it also sets this header for administrative emails.
> If you insist on a List-Id header line I'd propose the following
> (untested, though) procmail snippet:
>
> :0 fhw
> * ^X-Mailing-List: .*\/[a-z][a-z0-9\.\-]*@[a-z0-9\.\-]*
> | formail -A "List-Id: live GNU/Linux <$MATCH>"
:)
> --
> GNU GPL: "The source will be with you... always."
Nice one.
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, send an email to live-gnu-linux-request@lists.infodrom.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.infodrom.org
Uh, two signatures ? :)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed Mar 24 2004 - 21:55:16 CET