RE : syslog patches

From: John Hughes (John@Calva.COM)
Date: Fri Sep 13 2002 - 09:22:40 CEST

  • Next message: Miller, Scott L: "[PATCH] log the facility/priority in the log files"

    > Right, they haven't made it yet, but they're under consideration.
    > Small patches that are well documented, easy to understand, which
    > are not intrusive and meet my own opinion about sysklogd, will
    > probably applied earlier.

    Hehehehe.

    My patches are
    1. poorly documented
    2. difficult to understand
    3. intrusive
    4. controversial.

    :-)

    and

    5. Not even complete,

    There's whole bunches of stuff that I have in my syslogd that
    I haven't worked up patches for. (Notably an attempt to minimise
    buffer copying of log messages: Inbound messages are moved into
    reference-counted buffers (with control char expansion) pointers
    to these buffers are then hung of the log file datastructures).

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Sep 13 2002 - 09:22:48 CEST