> To avoid this, we'd need a msgid buffer or something similar which
> would increase the complexity and size of newmail. I could accept
i think the current solution is better than complicating code.
> to save the last name+subject/msgid and check against this before
> reporting a new mail, however, duplicate mail wouldn't be recognised
> then.
> I'd rather leave the code with the attached patch.
sorry, i didnt get any attachment in the previous mail.
in fact i made small change inside the patch meanwhile -
there is one more printf to terminal in the code, which
has to be avoided...
pavel
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jul 30 2007 - 00:19:19 CEST