* Michael Meskes <email@example.com> [20010427 09:16]:
> > - based on potato; yes, I'd also rather have woody, but ATM I don't
> > think it will be stable enough soon. We'll have some updated packages
> Why? What exactly is not stable enough? I would prefer to get at least
> woody's base packages on that CD.
Me too. Lots of stuff is fixed in woody, such as dpkg 1.9 which fixed
the seg fault (which also exists on potato). If you look at
http://base.debian.net you will see that the base is quite ready imho.
Basing the LT CD on potato is duplicate effort and won't help the
woody freeze at all.
-- Martin Michlmayr firstname.lastname@example.org
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Fri Apr 27 2001 - 13:23:32 CEST