Re: CD (status)

Subject: Re: CD (status)
From: Othmar Pasteka (pasteka@kabsi.at)
Date: Tue May 30 2000 - 12:01:00 CEST

• sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Next message: Roland Bauerschmidt: "Re: paketliste"
• Previous message: Othmar Pasteka: "Re: paketliste"
• In reply to: Peter Ganten: "Re: CD (status)"
• Next in thread: Martin Schulze: "Re: CD (status)"
• Next in thread: Marcelo E. Magallon: "Re: CD (status)"
• Reply: Othmar Pasteka: "Re: CD (status)"
• Reply: Martin Schulze: "Re: CD (status)"

hi,

On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 11:12:43AM +0200, Peter Ganten wrote:
> I would say no. The packages in potato are quite well tested now,
> while woody is definitely marked unstable. We shouldn`t mix both
> distributions for a potato preview-CDROM.

as far as i understood the people on #gnome 0.8.0 is the useable
one the other ones aren't really useable that's why i ask.
otherwise i'd be fine with the version already in potato.

so long
Othmar

• Next message: Roland Bauerschmidt: "Re: paketliste"
• Previous message: Othmar Pasteka: "Re: paketliste"
• In reply to: Peter Ganten: "Re: CD (status)"
• Next in thread: Martin Schulze: "Re: CD (status)"
• Next in thread: Marcelo E. Magallon: "Re: CD (status)"
• Reply: Othmar Pasteka: "Re: CD (status)"
• Reply: Martin Schulze: "Re: CD (status)"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Tue May 30 2000 - 12:00:48 CEST