Subject: Re: task-linuxtag-*
From: Alexander Reelsen (email@example.com)
Date: Tue May 23 2000 - 15:25:15 CEST
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 03:25:13PM +0200, Othmar Pasteka wrote:
> erm, you should read the list more carefully. i already said that
> i do them. i am also waiting for a consensus whether we need a
> -server or not. alexander is against it, afaict, i am for it, so
> i hoped that the rest of the subscribers say _something_ but
> nothing yet :(. or there is mail lost ... whatever.
> btw. i also already sent the soruces for my 3 packages, so ...
> i am currently waiting for torsten that he grants me access to
> one of his base-only systems. but that's not that important
erm, I'm not against it, I said, I do not like the taskpackage contents
(you should read more carefully ;)), because it's IMHO a strange mix.
I meant that that task-package could possibly be split.
-- Alexander Reelsen http://joker.rhwd.de firstname.lastname@example.org GnuPG: pub 1024D/F0D7313C sub 2048g/6AA2EDDB email@example.com 7D44 F4E3 1993 FDDF 552E 7C88 EE9C CBD1 F0D7 313C Securing Debian: http://joker.rhwd.de/doc/Securing-Debian-HOWTO
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Tue May 23 2000 - 15:28:55 CEST